News

ISSN Number

2632-6779 (Print)  

2633-6898 (Online)

Abstracting/Indexing/Listing

Scopus

Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory (ProQuest)

MLA International Bibliography

MLA Directory of Periodicals

Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)

QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)

British National Bibliography

WAC Clearinghouse Journal Listings

EBSCO Education

ICI Journals Master List

ERIH PLUS

CNKI Scholar

Gale-Cengage

WorldCat

Crossref

Baidu Scholar

British Library

J-Gate

ROAD

BASE

Publons

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

ORE Directory

TIRF

China National Center for Philosophy and Social Sciences Documentation

 

Home Journal Index Online First

The Mediating Role of Vocabulary in Linking L1 Reading and L2 Proficiency

Download Full PDF

Siwon Park

Tetsuya Fukuda

Paul Wadden

Juntendo University, Japan

 

Abstract

This study examined how first language (L1) reading relates to second language (L2) proficiency and whether L2 vocabulary mediates that relationship in a Japanese university context. Participants were 213 first-year students at a private university. L1 reading was assessed with the Reading Skills Test (RST), L2 vocabulary with the New General Service List Test (NGSLT), and L2 proficiency with the TOEFL ITP sections of Listening, Structure and Written Expression, and Reading. A structural equation model estimated both direct and indirect paths among the three constructs. Results showed a positive effect of L1 reading on L2 vocabulary (β = .28, p < .05, 95% CI [.12, .44]) and a strong effect of vocabulary on L2 proficiency (β = .58, p < .001, 95% CI [.45, .71]). The direct path from L1 reading to L2 proficiency was small and not significant (β = .06, p > .05), indicating full mediation through vocabulary. Measurement limitations, including weak factor loadings for some TOEFL subtests (λ = .49-.64), warrant cautious interpretation. The findings highlight vocabulary as the primary channel through which L1 literacy advantages influence the placement-oriented proficiency measures used here. Pedagogically, sustained vocabulary instruction and continued support for L1 reading appear essential. Future research should broaden the definition of proficiency to include productive skills and adopt a longitudinal design to test whether vocabulary growth precedes later gains in overall proficiency.

 

Keywords

L1 reading ability, L2 proficiency, L2 vocabulary, structural equation modeling (SEM)